From 9f4488c771158a25226a56091d95ce79ab1cd831 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: hl-valdemar Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 23:53:08 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] docs: track removal of Herdr palette polling workaround --- TODO.md | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/TODO.md b/TODO.md index 0a88b85..14a3ca5 100644 --- a/TODO.md +++ b/TODO.md @@ -14,3 +14,5 @@ - [ ] diff view: github integration (code review) - add comments on a pr, add review comments at specific lines of files, request changes, approve pr, etc. - [ ] diff view: local review comments (same features as for github reviews) that allows review of local changes to deliver specific reviews to ai agents used for coding. - design question: would this require a server that the agent can interact with, or would local review files be fine? don't want to use server client stuff, if it would be easier and better to just use local files. +- [ ] remove the diff palette polling fallback once a released Herdr fix delivers palette-ready DEC 2031 notifications, including palette-only changes with an unchanged light/dark preference. Related upstream issue: [herdrdev/herdr#4183](https://github.com/herdrdev/herdr/issues/4183). + - verify that notification-triggered queries return fresh colors in Ghostty through Herdr before removal; retain startup, focus-regain, and notification-driven palette refresh.