Files
vamp/TODO.md
T
2026-10-16 18:52:58 +02:00

4.4 KiB

  • we should be able to execute commands in visual mode, since some commands may relevant to selections.
  • diff view: local review UX first, independently of GitHub integration, for reviewing local changes and delivering feedback to coding agents.
    • add comments at the caret or on selected line ranges on either diff side; compose/edit with normal editor interaction, delete drafts, navigate comments, and open a review overview.
    • use gutter markers and a focused floating comment editor over the whole diff text workspace, without adding source-side splits or inserting comment text into source rows.
    • support a review summary and local verdict: Looks good / Changes requested.
    • save and reopen reviews using local files that coding agents can read; no server or client/server protocol.
    • anchor comments to immutable revision IDs, paths, sides, and source line ranges, never screen coordinates or mutable file indices.
    • preserve original anchors and mark comments stale when the reviewed snapshot no longer matches; defer automatic reanchoring.
  • persist local reviews automatically.
    • default to $XDG_DATA_HOME/vamp/reviews/, falling back to ~/.local/share/vamp/reviews/; allow a configurable review_directory.
    • key files by repository identity and review ID, preserving reviews and stale comments across revision changes.
    • autosave committed comment edits, summaries, verdicts, and deletions; retain explicit save-as for sharing with agents.
    • surface write failures without discarding drafts.
  • diff view: GitHub code review integration after the local review UX is usable.
    • publish local reviews explicitly: general PR comments, inline line/range comments, review summaries, approval, and requests for changes.
    • preserve explicit PR identity and reviewed commit IDs; validate anchors against GitHub's PR diff and recheck the PR head before submission.
    • keep authentication, network requests, publishing, and remote thread synchronization out of the local UX work; treat timed-out writes as unknown outcomes rather than automatically retrying.
    • define follow-on scope for reading/replying to remote threads, editing/deleting published comments, and resolving threads.
  • remove the diff palette polling fallback once a released Herdr fix delivers palette-ready DEC 2031 notifications, including palette-only changes with an unchanged light/dark preference. Related upstream issue: herdrdev/herdr#4183.
    • verify that notification-triggered queries return fresh colors in Ghostty through Herdr before removal; retain startup, focus-regain, and notification-driven palette refresh.
  • pull a pr description and display it in a buffer:
    • open a selector that allows you to pick a pr from remote
    • selector should be searchable
    • selected pr description is opened in a separate buffer/tab.
    • open related pr description directly from diff view (should be able to figure out the relevant pr from the branch involved in the diff - if jj, then from tracked bookmark; if just git, then from branch)
  • sandboxed, revision-specific LSP analysis for historical diff states and historical tabs.
    • current limitation: immutable snapshot buffers still use the live repository as their LSP workspace; cross-file analysis can mix historical text with current disk contents.
    • lazily materialize the complete selected revision, including unchanged files, manifests, and project configuration; run a separate LSP instance rooted in that snapshot.
    • mount historical source read-only and provide isolated writable scratch directories for caches, indexes, and build output; keep historical navigation targets read-only.
    • enforce an OS-level sandbox on the LSP process and every child it spawns, including build scripts and procedural macros. A temporary checkout and read-only editor buffers are not security isolation.
    • deny access to the live checkout, home directory, credentials, and SSH agent; deny network access by default. Additional access or code-execution permissions require explicit approval.
    • fail closed: if these restrictions cannot be enforced, keep read-only viewing available but do not launch historical LSP analysis; never silently fall back to an unrestricted process.
    • retain the snapshot and analysis environment while historical views/tabs reference it; stop workers and clean up disposable storage after the final reference closes.